Make presidential race about issues, not a spitball fight
Jesse L. Jackson, Sr. | 6/8/2016, 8:45 p.m.
Donald Trump has now won the delegates needed to give him the Republican presidential nomination. The Bernie Sanders surge continues, but Hillary Clinton apparently has the presidential superdelegate support needed to give her the nomination. We're headed to a race with two candidates burdened with record-levels of disfavor.
This leads to the widespread expectation of a spitball brawl for a campaign. Trump
has already begun branding Clinton. The Clinton campaign has begun attacking Trump as reckless and unqualified. A negative campaign of branded insults will drive down turnout. It would be a disservice to this country and its people.
The United States faces major challenges. We have an economy that does not work
for working people, who struggle with stagnant or declining wages, increasing
insecurity, and soaring costs of basic needs from health care to college education to retirement security. Record numbers are in poverty. Shameless tax scams allow billionaires to pay lower tax rates than the police who protect their homes. Global corporations stash trillions abroad and pay lower tax rates than mom-and-pop small businesses.
Climate change is a real and present danger that the Pentagon rightly says poses
a rising national security threat. The president's efforts to extract us from the
endless wars in the Middle East have been frustrated. Tensions are rising with both
Russia and China. We're running trade deficits of $500 billion a year, undermining
good jobs here. In our cities, the impoverished are more concentrated, more isolated,
with less hope and more dope and violence.
We need a real debate about the choices we face. Donald Trump has used insult more than policy to win his nomination. But he's begun to make policy addresses. He recently gave a speech on energy policy. He vowed to unravel the Paris climate agreement, rescind the Obama climate change rules, revive the coal industry and redouble our efforts to achieve pure energy independence. He vowed to "deal with real environmental challenges, not the phony ones we've been hearing about," presumably climate change.
Clinton has a detailed agenda on energy policy. She believes climate change is a
real threat. She wants to build on the Paris agreements and capture the lead in
the emerging clean energy economy. The differences between the two positions are
stark and worthy of a great debate.
Similarly, Trump earlier gave a speech on foreign policy in which he challenged
many of the shibboleths of our foreign policy. He wants a stronger military that
is used less. He wants our allies to pay a greater share of the burden. He seems
more willing to negotiate and more skeptical about intervention. Again, there are
major substantive differences in direction and policy from Clinton.
The American people would benefit greatly if the election debate were focused on
these and other fundamental policy choices. Both candidates should continue to
detail their policies and debate their differences. The media should focus less
on gotcha questions, stop recycling insults and feeding the spitball fight, and