House on top of pile of money

By Wayne Horne

The quest for economic development is often the goal of taxing bodies to provide revenue that lessens the burden for the taxpayer. This is often a positive goal. In municipal government, that pursuit can become narrowly focused on the municipal government’s interest. The City of Joliet is the primary controller of where development occurs. Typically, where development occurs benefits all the affected taxing bodies. In fact, Joliet has a responsibility to all local taxing bodies to make sure the property tax impact is beneficial to all, not just the City of Joliet.

A few weeks back, an amended version of the Cullinan development plan was presented to the Joliet Plan Commission with a change in plans for the residential units being proposed. The plan changed the number of units from 260 apartments to 760 apartments. Apparently, the Plan Commission thought that a 300 percent increase in occupancy would be okay. Not so, the development is in the Troy School District. Troy School District is small compared to many surrounding districts and providing classrooms for that many additional school-age children is potentially overwhelming. Even if the apartment complex is marketed in such a way that limits the probability of the number of school-age children today, that does not mean it will stay that way in the future.

The Joliet City Council does not have a long-term comprehensive plan as a guideline that all can look to for future planning. All taxing bodies need a plan that allows for future planning so developers do not catch interested parties off-guard. Seems like a no-brainer for the City Council members. Perhaps that’s a question that should be considered for anyone wanting to be on the council in the future. Elections for the Mayor and City Council are next April. Taxpayers need an answer.

Stay tuned…

Comments welcome. Contact Wayne at wayneswords@thetimesweekly.com